Showing posts with label skin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label skin. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 1, 2011

Shout Outs

Updated 3/2017 -- photos/videos and all links removed (except to my own posts) as many no longer active.

David, Health Business Blog, is the host for this week’s Grand Rounds. You can read this week’s edition here.
Welcome to the latest edition of the Grand Rounds blog carnival, the weekly roundup of medical blog posts!
The Blog That Ate Manhattan kicks us off with the Meaningful Use Song, surely the most antic entry I’ve ever hosted. Can’t beat the zippy refrain “I am the model user of an EMR that’s meaningful.” ………….
…………………….…
Have you discovered Joanna Cannon’s blog yet? Here’s a nice post: Abor Vitae
The oak tree was worn and tired and sat in a field, where it waited to die.
“I have lived my life,” said the oak tree, “I have felt the seasons turn beneath my roots and I have watched the years unfold and spill themselves through my branches. Now it is time for me to move on.”
The other trees were distressed and pleaded with the oak tree to stay. ……
………………………………….
bongi, other things amanzi, has a new post after a hiatus: physician, heal thyself
even doctors get sick, but there is often a difference.
i was rotating through orthopaedics and was on call that night. …... once i had finished operating i rushed through the change rooms to get back to casualties. while i was changing i heard the unmistakable sounds of someone throwing up in the toilet cubicle. quite soon the door opened and out came the orthopaedic registrar who was on call that night with me. he did not look good……….
…………………………………
My friend Elizabeth, Methodical Madness, has a nice post: Fan Mail
I've had a handful of readers over the past couple of years e-mail me to ask me questions about pathology and advice about medicine but no one, until last Thursday, has ever prefaced their question as "Fan Mail." I was tickled pink. A first year medical student from a far away institution asked this, and kindly allowed me to answer in a post:
"My question for you is, are there times when you wished non-pathologist physicians remembered more about histology? What would you like them to know?"
The short answer is this: NOTHING. ……….
………………………………….
H/T to @hrana for the link to the Wall Street Journal article by Robert Johnson: Plastic surgery is on the rise among older Americans
Mary Lou Ray decided at age 65 that she had seen enough of the person in her mirror.
"My life led up to this. I had been divorced for 13 years, my children were grown, and with the death of my mother—not to be unkind—I was finally free of criticism about things like dyeing my hair," she says.
So last year she spent $13,000 on a face lift and other cosmetic procedures that proved rejuvenating.
"I'm absolutely thrilled," says Ms. Ray, a real-estate agent in Roanoke, Va. "I think a lot of friends in my age bracket would like to try this, but they're afraid of getting that unnatural, yanked-up look. I don't have that; I still look like me." ……..
………………………………………….
H/T to @DrVes for the link to the Lancet article: Haemorrhagic herpes zoster 

…………………………………………….
Check out this NPR article by Adam Cole: Visualizing How A Population Grows To 7 Billion   

Monday, July 25, 2011

Should Langer’s Lines be Used for Incisions?

Updated 3/2017-- all links (except to my own posts) removed as many no longer active. 

An old PRS journal article came to my attention recently thanks to a tweet by @prsjournal: “Most Emailed Article Langer's Lines: To Use or Not to Use: Thirty-six differently named guidelines have develope... http://bit.ly/mPR6v1”
[I’m not sure the time frame involved in the “most emailed.” Not sure if it’s for the day, the week, etc.] –
The tweeted article (first full reference below) is a short one and I would recommend it to young plastic surgeons and students.
A state of tension exists naturally in skin. For instance, wounded skin will gape, becoming elliptical instead of round. The first to notice this skin property was Dupuytren. In 1834, he encountered a corpse of a man who had stabbed himself with a round-tipped awl. Dupuytren noticed these stab wounds were elliptical instead of round. Then in 1838, Malgaigne wrote about the direction of these ellipses being different in different areas of the body. These two men did not drive home their point; Karl Langer, however, exhaustively studied the direction of these ellipses by stabbing a round-tipped awl into hundreds of cadavers. …….. but he is best remembered for his lines. ……….
In 1897, Kocher recognized the surgical importance of Langer's tension lines. He advised that surgical incisions follow these lines. However, Langer, an anatomy professor, did not intend for his lines to be used as guides for incisions. Later, Borges pointed out that Langer's lines represent lines of cleavage in cadavers and not lines of relaxed tension……….
Langer's lines are quite different from the relaxed skin tension lines of the face. These lines were described by Borges in 1962,and they are probably the most-accepted guide for incisions of the face………..
Langer's lines are almost perpendicular to Borges's relaxed skin tension lines in the areas of the scalp, forehead, glabella, midcheek, and lateral eye…………….
Cornelius Kraissl maintained that scars were least conspicuous when placed in wrinkle lines. … Kraissl recognized that wrinkles occurred perpendicular to muscle action. From this, he developed a scheme for elective incisions. However, these incisions might not be inconspicuous in patients without wrinkles or with ill-defined wrinkles. Also, wrinkle lines do not always coincide with Borges's relaxed skin tension lines. Hence, Borges's lines are the best guide for elective incisions of the face. …………….
Developed from cadavers with extremities in extension, Langer's lines are longitudinal over joints. Blocker and Hendrix recognized that Langer's longitudinal lines predisposed patients to contractures when they were used over joints. Oriented perpendicular to muscle action, Kraissl's lines have a more transverse orientation than Langer's. Accordingly, Kraissl's transverse lines of the upper extremity do not predispose patients to contracture formation. ……….
Many other factors contribute to the camouflaging of scars, including wrinkle and contour lines. Learn how to assess the direction of least tension on the wound and orient the closure accordingly.
Borges's and Kraissl's lines are better guides for elective incisions in the face and body, respectively, than Langer’s lines. Remember, they are only guidelines. (photo scanned in from 2nd reference article)


REFERENCE
1. Langer's Lines: To Use or Not to Use; Wilhelmi, Bradon J.; Blackwell, Steven J.; Phillips, Linda G.; Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 104(1):208-214, July 1999
2. The Selection of Appropriate Lines for Elective Surgical Incisions; Kraissl, Cornelius J; Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 8(1):1-28, July 1951.
3. Relaxed Skin Tension Lines (RSTL) versus Other Skin Lines; Borges, Albert F.; Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 73(1):144-150, January 1984.

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Sunscreen Graphics

Updated 3/2017-- photos and all links (except to my own posts) removed as many no longer active. 

Information is Beautiful has a superb post:  The Sunscreen Smokescreen meant to answer the question “How much sunscreen should you wear?”
The full graphic can be found here.  It begins by explaining UVA and UVB rays, goes on to explain SPF (UVA protection) and the star rating (UVB protection),  and protection times avoided by sunscreen.
I cropped out the middle section which is specific to the amount of sunscreen which should be used and how often it should be reapplied.  Not many (if any) of use use enough or reapply often enough.
The lower portion of the Information is Beautiful graph gives info on how cloud cover, reflective surfaces (snow, lakes, etc), and altitude affects the amount of  UVA/UVB radiation.  There is a section on skin cancers and one on the possible harmful effects of sunscreens.

Related posts:
Sun Protection (March 19, 2009)
Melanoma Review (February 25, 2008)
Melanoma Skin Screening Is Important (April 29, 2009)
Tanning Beds = High Cancer Risk (August 3, 2009)
Skin Cancer (March 24, 2010)
Safety of Sunscreens (June 14, 2010)
Dear 16-Year-Old Me (May 18, 2011)
New FDA Sunscreen Labeling  (June 15, 2011)

Monday, July 11, 2011

Laser Treatment of Stretch Marks – an Article Review

Updated 3/2017-- photos and all links (except to my own posts) removed as many no longer active. 

Stretch marks (striae distensae) are common.  They represent linear dermal scars accompanied by epidermal atrophy.  Stretch marks aren’t a significant medical problem, but can be a source of significant emotional distress.
There are many treatments available, ranging from therapy applied to the skin, laser therapy, and even more invasive surgical methods. Unfortunately, stretch marks remain a tricky problem to target, in which no established treatment exists.
A recent article in the  May issue of the Aesthetic Surgery Journal (full reference below) discusses the use of fractional nonablative laser treatment for stretch marks.
Dr. Francesca de Angelis and colleagues conducted a clinical study involving 51 patients with striae, three male and 48 female,  who were treated between May 2007 to May 2008.  Several patients had striae on multiple areas of the body so a total of 79 striae locations were treated.  
Patient ages ranged from 13 to 56 years (mean, 33 years). Fitzpatrick skin type ranged from II to IV. The duration of striae ranged from one to 40 years, with an average duration of 12 years. The striae formed as a result of pubertal growth (41%, n = 21), pregnancy (31%, n = 16), weight change (20%, n = 10), muscular atrophy (2%, n = one ), or unknown causes (6%, n = three).
Anatomical locations for treatment included the hips, breasts, abdomen, flanks, knees, buttocks, arms, thighs, and shoulders, with the majority of treatments occurring on the first three sites.
The stated objective of this study was to determine whether the 1540-nm Er:Glass laser could safely and effectively improve the appearance of both striae rubra and alba while minimizing the risk of PIH.
The laser used in this study, the fractional nonablative 1540-nm erbium:glass (Er:Glass) laser (Lux1540; Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc., Burlington, Massachusetts), is currently the only fractional laser approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat striae.
Treatment parameters included two to three passes with the 1540-nm laser, with energy settings from 35 to 55 mJ/mb with the 10-mm optical tip or 12 to 14 mJ/mb with the 15-mm optical tip. Two to four total treatments were performed at four- to six-week intervals.
Patients were given a pretreatment regimen which consisted of applying a compound of 1% hydrocortisone, 4% hydroquinone cream, and 3% vitamin C to their striae for 30 days prior to treatment.
After treatment, patients were instructed to apply moisturizing cream multiple times per day to maintain hydration of the skin and to help reduce erythema. All patients were also instructed to apply the same pretreatment topical compound to their treated striae every day for three to six months after their final treatment.
Both nonblinded and blinded reviewers evaluated the percent improvement after treatment on a 0% to 100% quartile scale.
Skin reactions were assessed by the treating physician and recorded at multiple time points, and histology was conducted with hemotoxylin and eosin as well as Orcein-Giemsa staining.
The researchers report
H&E staining of pretreatment tissue samples revealed an atrophied epidermis and flattened rete ridges within the papillary dermis. No intact collagen fibers were identifiable in the striae before treatment, and the degenerated appearance of the fibers resulted in uneven staining as well as indistinct borders.
In contrast, following three 1540-nm treatments with the 10-mm tip at 40 mJ and 10-ms pulse width, significant neocollagenesis was observed. Elastic fibers in the reticular dermis appeared sparse and fragmented prior to the 1540-nm treatment.
One month after the third treatment, elastic fibers were uniformly increased in number throughout the reticular dermis.
My biggest problem with this study is how do the researchers know the laser was the source of improvement rather than their pre- and post-treatment topical skin care.  Why not do a comparison of areas treated with the topicals verse the topicals and laser? 
The photos included did show some improvement, but …. (photo source, the article)

 


REFERENCE
Fractional Nonablative 1540-nm Laser Treatment of Striae Distensae in Fitzpatrick Skin Types II to IV: Clinical and Histological Results;  F de Angelis, L Kolesnikova, F Renato, G Liguori; Aesthetic Surgery Journal May 2011 31: 411-419, doi:10.1177/1090820X11402493

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Cocaine and Ear Necrosis

Updated 3/2017-- photos and all links (except to my own posts) removed as many no longer active. 

Last week Science Daily had a brief article noting the association of contaminated cocaine with ear necrosis:   Contaminated Cocaine Triggers Decaying, Dying Skin  (photo credit) 
I’ve written about skin complications from drug abuse in the past, but this is not one I knew of.  Most common are skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs).
The crusty, purplish areas of dead skin (purpura) that can occur with this contaminated cocaine are extremely painful and can open the door to nasty infections.  (note the lower lobe of the ear in the photo)
Apparently the cocaine is contaminated with a de-worming drug commonly used by veterinarians called levamisole,  noted by the U.S. DEA to have been found in 30% of confiscated cocaine in 2008 and 70% in 2009.
This complication from the use of the contaminated cocaine was recently reported in the June issue of the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (full reference below).  The report highlights six new and very similar patient cases of purpura, mostly on and around the ears, following the contaminated cocaine use.  There were six cases --  four seen in Rochester, N.Y. and two in Los Angeles. 
Although in each case an extensive battery of blood tests ruled out the usual causes of purpura, the JAAD paper authors write “because testing is not easily performed, we did not test for levamisole in the serum or blood to prove this is the causative agent.”
From the Science Digest article:
According to Mary Gail Mercurio, M.D., an author and associate professor in the Department of Dermatology at the University of Rochester Medical Center, "When we first started seeing these patients they all had a similar clinical picture, but they were really an enigma because they weren't falling into any other pattern we'd seen before. When a colleague at the National Institutes of Health mentioned levamisole contamination, we did toxicity screens and lo-and-behold, all the patients came up positive for cocaine. We had our diagnosis."
Drug enforcement officials have detected levamisole -- which was once used to treat colon cancer -- in cocaine since 2003, but have watched it increase rapidly in recent years. The Drug Enforcement Administration says that the drug, which is inexpensive, is used more and more as a diluting agent in order to stretch supplies. Study authors report that levamisole is known to increase dopamine, a neurotransmitter that helps control the brain's reward and pleasure centers, causing experts to believe it is also added to cocaine to further enhance or prolong the user's high.
Researchers don't know how levamisole causes purpura, which occurs when vessels become plugged and blood can't flow to the skin, leading to skin death and the resulting purplish, crusty appearance. Cocaine alone constricts blood vessels, which is probably the first step, but how levamisole contributes is not yet understood, Mercurio said.
The purpura can occur with both smoking and snorting of the tainted cocaine.  Treatment options include steroids to prevent inflammation, but stopping the exposure to cocaine is the best medicine.




REFERENCES
Characteristic purpura of the ears, vasculitis, and neutropenia–a potential public health epidemic associated with levamisole-adulterated cocaine; Catherine Chung, Paul C. Tumeh, Ron Birnbaum, Belinda H. Tan, Linda Sharp, Erin McCoy, Mary Gail Mercurio, Noah Craft; Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 09 June 2011, (10.1016/j.jaad.2010.08.024)
U.S. DEA:  Drugs of Abuse – 2011 Edition

Monday, June 27, 2011

Ideal Dressing for STSG Donor Site – an Article Review

Updated 3/2017-- photos and all links (except to my own posts) removed as many no longer active. 

In the 2009 review (2nd reference below),  Voineskos and colleagues did a literature review of skin graft donor-site dressings.  They noted that although there is no clear evidence that moist dressings are any better overall when compared with dry dressings,  there is evidence that moist dressings tend to be less painful than dry dressings.
Donor sites take an average of 7 to 21 days to heal, depending on their size, location, and the patient's health status. 
This latest study (first article referenced below) compared Aquacel and a modified (perforated) polyurethane dressing modified (MPD).  The study is a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial which included 50 adult patients. 
The authors state (bold emphasis is mine):
The ideal dressing should protect the wound from desiccation and at the same time permit gas exchange to accelerate reepithelialization. It should be impermeable to exogenous microorganisms, comfortable for the patient and the ward staff and associated with only minimal labor input. Moreover, the dressing should be flexible and pliable to permit conformation to irregular wound surfaces. Resistance to linear and shear stress are required as well as good tensile strength to resist fragmentation and retention of membrane fragments when removed. It should, furthermore, be adaptable to the varying dimensions of donor sites and, in spite of everything; it should also be of low cost. Existing dressing materials meet some of these criteria but fail to fulfill all of them, especially in larger donor sites.
Dornseifer and colleagues had previously (4th reference) noted that the “single disadvantage of polyurethane film dressings is an uncontrolled leakage” which they solved by modifying it by perforating the polyurethane film.  This  permits a controlled leakage into a secondary absorbent dressing.
They chose to compare this MPD to Aquacel ® (ConvaTec, Skillman, NJ, USA), a sodium carboxy-methylcellulose hydrocolloid polymer that is claimed to have a high fluid-absorptive capacity and was also described to be a new preferred donor site dressing. (5th reference)
Half of the skin graft donor sites were dressed with an application of Aquacel(R) and half with MPD.  The dressings were kept unchanged for ten days at which time they were removed and the epithelialization rate of both sites was evaluated. Pain scores were assessed according to a 0 to 5 numeric pain scale every postoperative day, as well as during dressing removal.
In this small study, MPD was found to best Aquacel ®.  More MPD donor sites completely reepithelialized by 10 days than the Aquacel ® sites (86.4% vs 54.5%).
MPD was significantly less painful until and during removal of the dressing (p < 0.001).
Pain at the donor site during the postoperative period was consistently low after wound coverage with both materials, considering that 90% of the values assessed by the six-items pain scale were equal to or less than 1 (minimal intermittent pain) at both sites.
However, when patients were asked to compare both sites, a significantly higher percentage of MPD sites were rated superior to the Aquacel® sites
Dornseifer and colleagues note the costs of the Aquacel® dressing turned out to be about four times more expensive, relating to a donor site of 8 x 20 cm2 and depending on the
respective price level.
Scarring was inconspicuous in both groups 60 days following surgery and no significant differences were detected between the MPD and Aquacel® treated donor sites.







REFERENCES
1.  The ideal split-thickness skin graft donor site dressing: a clinical comparative trial of a modified polyurethane dressing and Aquacel(R); Dornseifer, Ulf; Lonic, Daniel; Ivo Gerstung, Tristan; Herter, Frank; Max Fichter, Andreas; Holm, Charlotte; Schuster, Tibor; Ninkovic, Milomir; Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery., POST ACCEPTANCE, 15 June 2011; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182268c02
2.  Systematic Review of Skin Graft Donor-Site Dressings; Voineskos, Sophocles H.; Ayeni, Olubimpe A.; McKnight, Leslie; Thoma, Achilleas; Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 124(1):298-306, July 2009; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a8072f
3.  The theoretically ideal donor site; Birdsell, D. C., Hein, K. S., Lindsay, R. L.; dressing. Ann Plast Surg 2: 535-537, 1979.
4.   The ideal split-thickness skin graft donor site dressing: rediscovery of polyurethane film;  Dornseifer, U., Fichter, A. M., Herter, F., et al.; Ann Plast Surg 63: 198-200, 2009.
5.  Clinical comparative study of aquacel and paraffin gauze dressing for split-skin donor site treatment; Barnea, Y., Amir, A., Leshem, D., et al.;   Ann Plast Surg 53: 132-136, 2004.

Monday, June 20, 2011

Sensible Treatment of Warts

Updated 3/2017-- photos and all links (except to my own posts) removed as many no longer active. 

I was alerted to this not too sensible way of treating warts (H/T Doctor Grumpy)  --- Security guard tries to remove wart from finger with a shotgun (bold emphasis is mine)
A SECURITY guard from South Yorkshire shot himself in the hand to try to remove a wart from his finger.
Sean Murphy, 38, lost most of his left middle finger after using the stolen 12-bore Beretta shotgun at a garden centre in Doncaster.  ……
But he said: “The best thing is that the wart has gone. It was giving me lot of trouble.”   ………

My post from September 2009 gives much more sensible treatment methods for wart removal.  Here it is: 

I’m sure I don’t see as many patients with common skin warts as my family practice or dermatology colleagues, but these patients still make it to my office.  Sometimes it’s the primary complaint, sometimes it’s an afterthought.  In reviewing the topic, it occurred to me that most patients don’t need to see any of us for this problem.  They mostly need to accept the fact that the treatment takes TIME.  So if you will persist, then you will often be successful without the expense of seeing a doctor.  (photo credit)
Common warts (Verruca vulgaris) are caused by the human papillomavirus (HPV).  Warts on the hands or feet do not carry the same clinical consequences of HPV infection in the genital area.  It is estimated about 10% of children and adolescents have warts at any given time.  As many as 22% of children will contract warts during childhood.
Common warts can occur anywhere on the body, but 70% occur on the hand.  Often they will disappear on their own within a year.  Even with treatment, warts can take up to a year to go away.
Before heading to the doctor, there are treatments you can try at home:  salicylic acid or duct tape.
When using the 17% salicylic acid gel (one brand name: Compound W), it must be applied every day until the wart is gone.  Only apply to the wart, not the skin around the wart.  This treatment is enhanced by covering the wart with an occlusive water-proof band-aid or duct tape after applying the acid.  It can also be enhanced by gently filing the wart with an emery board daily to remove the dead cells prior to applying the salicylic acid.  Treatment can take weeks to months.  Don’t give up early.
Duct Tape can take weeks or months to be effective.   Apply the duct tape to the wart and  keep it in place for six days.  After removing the tape, soak the wart, and pare it down with a filing (emery) board.  Repeat the above until the wart disappears.  Once again, don’t give up early.
The two  treatments (salicylic acid and duct tape) can be combined.  Apply the salicylic acid liquid to the wart before bedtime.  After letting it air dry for a minute or so,  then apply the duct tape over the wart, completely covering the area. Remove the duct tape the following morning. Each time you remove the tape, you will be debriding some of the wart tissue. Repeat the application each night, until there is no remaining wart tissue.  As with using only one treatment, don’t give up early.
If the above don’t work or you just don’t want to take the time, then you may wish to see your physician for removal.  He can use cryotherapy to destroy the wart.   This method may involve repeated treatment over several weeks.  You can do the following to “get the wart ready for removal” and make the cryotherapy more effective:
  1. Every night for 2 weeks, clean the wart with soap and water and put 17% salicylic acid gel (one brand name: Compound W) on it.
  2. After putting on the gel, cover the wart with a piece of 40% salicylic acid pad (one brand name: Mediplast). Cut the pad so that it is a little bit bigger than the wart. The pad has a sticky backing that will help it stay on the wart.
  3. Leave the pad on the wart for 24 hours. If the area becomes very sore or red, stop using the gel and pad and call your doctor's office.
  4. After you take the pad off, clean the area with soap and water, put more gel on the wart and put on another pad. If you are very active during the day and the pad moves off the wart, you can leave the area uncovered during the day and only wear the pad at night.
If none of the above work, then your wart may need to be removed surgically.  Remember the above all take time, so give them time to work.  Even if the wart disappears with any of the above treatments, it may recur later.


Sources
Treatment of Warts; Medscape Article, May 27, 2005: W. Steven Pray, PhD, DPh; Joshua J. Pray, PharmD
What Can Be Done About a Hand Wart That Keeps Reappearing After Removal?; Medscape Article, May 31, 2007; Richard S. Ferri, PhD, ANP, ACRN, FAAN
Duct tape and moleskin equally effective in treating common warts; Medscape Article 2007; Barclay L.
Duct Tape More Effective than Cryotherapy for Warts; AAFP, Feb 1, 2003; Karl E. Miller, M.D.

Thursday, May 19, 2011

Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer in IBD Patients

 Updated 3/2017-- all links (except to my own posts) removed as many no longer active.

I stumbled across this review article (first full reference below) earlier this week.  
Skin cancer is the most common form of cancer in the United States.  Most skin cancers form in older people on parts of the body exposed to the sun or in people who have weakened immune systems (such as inflammatory bowel disease patients on immunosuppressive therapy). 
According to the National Cancer Institute (NCI), in there were more than one million new cases of nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSC) in the United States in 2010.  There were less than 1,000 NMSC deaths during the same time.
NMSC includes  squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and basal cell carcinoma (BCC).   Both occur more frequently on sunlight-exposed areas such as the head and neck. BCC is far more common than SCC and accounts for approximately 75% of all NMSC.
The causes of NMSC in the general public are multifactorial, including both environmental and host factors. Known environmental risk factors for NMSC include sun exposure (ultraviolet [UV] light), ionizing radiation, cigarette smoking, and certain chemical exposures such as arsenic. Host risk factors include human papilloma virus infection, genetic susceptibilities, skin type, and immunosuppression. 
That last risk factor mentioned – immunosuppression—is one IBD patients have in common with solid organ transplant patients (kidneys, livers, lungs, face, hands).  Note the third reference below.  The results summary of that article
Two hundred patients developed a first NMSC after a median follow-up of 6.8 years after transplantation. The 3-year risk of the primary NMSC was 2.1%. Of the 200 patients with a primary NMSC, 91 (45.5%) had a second NMSC after a median follow-up after the first NMSC of 1.4 years (range, 3 months to 10 years). The 3-year risk of a second NMSC was 32.2%, and it was 49 times higher than that in patients with no previous NMSC. In a Cox proportional hazards regression model, age older than 50 years at the time of transplantation and male sex were significantly related to the first NMSC. Occurrence of the subsequent NMSC was not related to any risk factor considered, including sex, age at transplantation, type of transplanted organ, type of immunosuppressive therapy, histologic type of the first NMSC, and time since diagnosis of the first NMSC. Histologic type of the first NMSC strongly predicted the type of the subsequent NMSC

Attention is now being paid to other patients (ie IBD, rheumatoid arthritis) on immunosuppression and their increased risk of NMSC.
Millie D. Long, MD and colleagues (first reference) note that  no IBD-specific, evidence-based guidelines for NMSC prevention exist.  The current recommendations for prevention of skin cancer for the general population include sun avoidance and sun protection strategies include protective clothing, hats, sunglasses, and sunscreens.   Sun avoidance should include tanning bed avoidance.
Any skin lesion suspicious for malignancy in a patient with IBD on immunosuppression should be evaluated by a trained dermatologist.  Among solid-organ transplant recipients, annual skin examination is recommended by various transplant organizations.
Long and colleagues note “There are no guidelines for skin cancer screening in patients with IBD, as it is unclear whether the risk–benefit ratio of skin cancer screening in IBD patients correlates with that of the general population, or more closely with that of the solid-organ transplant population. Consideration could be given in the future to skin cancer screening programs for patients with IBD on immunosuppression.” 



REFERENCE
1.  Nonmelanoma skin cancer in inflammatory bowel disease: A review; Millie D. Long, Michael D. Kappelman and Clare A. Pipkin; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Volume 17, Issue 6, pages 1423–1427, June 2011; Article first published online: 25 OCT 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/ibd.21484
2.  National Cancer Institute; Skin Cancer
3.  Incidence and Clinical Predictors of a Subsequent Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients With a First Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer: A Multicenter Cohort Study; Gianpaolo Tessari; Luigi Naldi; Luigino Boschiero; Francesco Nacchia; Francesca Fior; Alberto Forni; Carlo Rugiu; Giuseppe Faggian; Fabrizia Sassi; Eliana Gotti; Roberto Fiocchi; Giorgio Talamini; Giampiero Girolomoni; Arch Dermatol. 2010;146(3):294-299

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Dear 16-Year-Old Me

Updated 3/2017-- photos/video and all links (except to my own posts) removed as many no longer active. 

I learned about this education video via @SeattleMamaDoc. 

Sun safe practices:
  • Staying in the shade, especially between the sun’s peak hours (10 a.m. - 4 p.m.).
  • Covering up with clothing, a brimmed hat and UV-blocking sunglasses.
  • Avoiding tanning and UV tanning booths.
  • Use sunscreen, SPF 15 or above, preferably one with a sunblock component also.  To protect against the UVA rays, the product needs to have avobenzone (Parsol 1789), ecamsule (Mexoryl), titanium dioxide, or micro-zinc oxide.
Sunscreens should not be used in babies under 6 months old.  It is recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics for this group to use other sun safe practices such as the ones just mentioned.


Related blog posts:
Sun Protection (March 19, 2009)
Melanoma Review (February 25, 2008)
Melanoma Skin Screening Is Important (April 29, 2009)
Tanning Beds = High Cancer Risk (August 3, 2009)
Skin Cancer (March 24, 2010)

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Spring’s Poison Ivy Warning

Updated 3/2017-- photos and all links removed as many no longer active. 

This past weekend I helped my husband and his mother clean up some debris from the storms which had come through Thursday night/Friday morning.  Here are before and after photos.


Around the periphery of her yard and growing up her trees is poison ivy.
If you have read my blog over the past few years, you may recall that poison ivy and I don’t mix well.  I seem to have managed to not accidently grab any of it when picking up limbs and debris.   I am very thankful.
Still, it’s time to remind myself and you to watch out for poison ivy as you get outside to walk and play.
……
Here is a “updated” version of my post from May 23, 2008
I love to walk in the woods with my dog. I am lucky to have a neighbor who has a trail through her woods around her pond that she encourages us to use. This time of year I have to watch out for poison ivy. In the picture here you can see the poison ivy (leaves of three) intermingled with some Virginia Creeper (five leaves). I find both very pretty.

However, to the poison ivy I tend to react like this (photo credit):

Dr. Paul Auerbach wrote a review of the product Zanfel in 2008.  In the comment section White Coat left this helpful suggestion
One of the other things that helps to some degree is "Ivy Block" - it allegedly keeps the urushiol from binding to the skin.  http://www.ivyblock.com/ivyblock.php
Also, TechNu is reported to work as well as Zanfel, but is significantly less expensive.  http://www.teclabsinc.com/products.cfm?id=1F5604C8-9D05-4675-56129F6D83DF2417§ion=1
Also, check out the post he did “Poison Ivy – Son of an Itch”

REFERENCE
Leaves of Three, Let Them Be: If Only It Were That Easy; Medscape Article, May 28, 2004; Patricia L Jackson Allen, MS, RN, PNP, FAAN

Monday, March 14, 2011

Melanocyte-Keratinocyte Transplantation (MKTP) Surgery

 Updated 3/2017-- photos and all links removed as many are no longer active and it was easier than checking each one.

Browsing the news I stumbled across this March 2010 article on ScienceDaily -- Skin Transplant Offers New Hope to Vitiligo Patients.  Though I know a little of vitiligo, I admit I had never heard of MKTP surgery.  Interesting.
MKTP (melanocyt-keratinocyte-transplantation) surgery  is performed in Europe, Asia and Middle East, but not commonly in the United States.  The article noted Henry Ford Hospital is the first to perform the procedure in the U.S. and are using the same technique developed by MKTP pioneer Sanjeev Mulekar, M.D., of the National Vitiligo Center in Saudi Arabia.
MKTP involves harvesting melanocyte cells from an area of healthy skin and separating them to make a skin cell mixture. This mixture is then applied to the treatment area and covered with a specially developed adhesive biologic dressing.  The procedure is done using local anesthesia.
Treated areas included the hands, arms, legs, feet, face and stomach. The average size of the treated area during each procedure covered an area of 46 sq cm, or roughly the size of a credit card.

More Information
Treatment of post-burn leucoderma with non-cultured melanocyte–keratinocyte transplantation (MKTP); Mulekar SV, Issa AA, Eisa AA;  Burns, November 2010; doi:10.1016/j.burns.2010.08.014

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

New Research in Prevention of Keloid Scars

Updated 3/2017-- photos and all links removed as many are no longer active and it was easier than checking each one.

A keloid scar is the result of an abnormal proliferation of scar tissue that forms at the site of an injury to the skin (eg, on the site of a surgical incision or trauma).  Keloid scars do not regress.  They grow beyond the original margins of the scar which differs from hypertrophic scars which while raised do not grow beyond the boundaries of the original wound.  Hypertrophic scars may reduce over time. 
Keloid scars tend to recur after excision so anything that can help me prevent their formation is welcome.
I stumbled across this press release a few weeks ago.  It explains the findings published in the article (first reference below) published online January 21, 2011in the British Journal of Dermatology which notes a possible molecular target in the prevention of keloid scarring.
Collagen triple helix repeat containing-1 protein (CTHRC1) inhibits the transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1-stimulated collagen production that occurs in keloid scar formation, report researchers.
"Keloids are manifestations of an abnormal process of tissue repair after trauma to the skin. Options for treatment are limited because of lack of understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms governing the formation," explain Hongxiang Chen (Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China) and colleagues.
"Increased understanding of the role of TGF-β signaling in keloids makes manipulation of TGF-β an attractive therapeutic strategy," they say.
CTHRC1 is expressed in the adventitia and neointima on arterial injury. Chen and team assessed regulation of the CTHRC1 gene, its interaction with TGF-β1, and its possible role in keloid scar formation in fibroblast cells from keloid tissue and normal skin.
TGF-β1 and CTHRC1 were localized to the dermis in both normal and keloid skin fibroblasts. Expression of both factors were increased in keloid compared with normal skin and CTHRC1 appeared to increase in a TGF-β1 concentration-dependent manner.
When keloid fibroblasts were treated with TGF-β1 (10 ng/ml), cell proliferation increased dramatically, specifically, collagen type I synthesis was preferentially stimulated.
However, when recombinant CTHRC1 was added to the TGF-β1-treated keloid cells, the proliferation effect was reversed and excess collagen synthesis was inhibited.
Notably, treatment with recombinant CTHRC1 appeared to have no adverse effects on cell viability.
"Our data indicated that TGF-β1 was overexpressed in keloid fibroblasts and recombinant CTHRC1 could reverse TGF-β1-induced collagen type I expression at least in part by decreasing collagen synthesis," conclude the authors.
"As a potent negative regulator of collagen matrix deposition, CTHRC1 may have therapeutic value in antifibrotic treatment strategies," they suggest.

It would be nice if someday this research lead to a “prevention” therapy.


Related posts:
Scars and Their Therapy – an Article Review  (January 21, 2009)
Fluorouracil Treatment of Problematic Scars – an Article Review  (April 1, 2009)
Scar Scales and Measuring Devices  (September 8, 2010)
 

REFERENCES
1.  Collagen triple helix repeat containing 1 inhibits TGF-β1-induced collagen type I expression in keloid; J. Li, J. Cao, M. Li, Y. Yu, Y. Yang, X. Xiao, Z. Wu, L. Wang, Y. Tu, H. Chen; British Journal of Dermatology, January 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10215.x
2.  Treatment of a Postburn Keloid Scar with Topical Captopril: Report of the First Case; Ardekani, Gholamreza Safaee; Aghaie, Shahin; Nemati, Mohammad Hassan; Handjani, Farhad; Kasraee, Behrooz; Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 123(3):112e-113e, March 2009; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31819a34db
3.  Correction: Treatment of a Postburn Keloid Scar with Topical Captopril: Report of the First Case; Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 123(6):1898, June 2009; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181abc4b4
4.  Keloid and Hypertrophic Scar; eMedicine article, May 2010; Brian Berman, MD, PhD, Whitney Valins, Sadegh Amini, MD, Martha H Viera, MD
5.  Wound Healing, Keloids; eMedicine article, June 26, 2009; R Edward Newsome, MD, Ravi Tandon, MD, Robert P Bolling, MD, MPH, Alun R Wang, MD, PhD, David A Jansen, MD

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Closure of Facial Mohs’ Defects

Updated 3/2017-- photos and all links removed as many are no longer active and it was easier than checking each one.I

t is very likely there will never be a complete consensus on the best or correct way to close defects left by Mohs’ surgical excision of skin cancers on the face. 
Which is best?  Direct linear closure.  Local flap. Skin graft.
In my opinion, it comes down to multiple factors but perhaps the most important are:   Where on the face is the defect?  How lax is the surrounding skin? 
The authors of the recent Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Journal article on the topic (full reference below) write in their introduction in favor of direct closure (the first step in the reconstructive ladder):
This first step on the reconstructive ladder is often overlooked in favor of more intricate local flap options. If performed properly, direct linear closure results in superior aesthetic results that are more predictable and involve less tissue dissection than local flap options. 
The article is a retrospective review of 1354 reconstructions performed post-Mohs’ facial defects by the senior author (JFT)between 2001 and 2008.  
Forehead (96/125 closed directly in this study) –-their maximum size for direct closure was 3.6 cm.  A nice tip from JFT to determine orientation of the final closure:
The senior author's (J.F.T.) preferred technique for forehead repairs is to place a single silk stitch in both directions, tailor-tack the wound closed, and orient the resultant closure based on which direction yields the least tension, with dog-ear excision following the closure. Dog-ears are meticulously excised on the forehead.
Nose (46/707 closured directly in this study) –- maximum defect size 1.2 cm on nasal dorsum, < 1 cm on tip.
The indications for direct linear closure on the nose are more limited than other anatomical areas on the face because of the relative paucity of skin laxity and the risk of alar distortion.
Lip (37/138 closed directly in this study) – maximum defect 3 cm.
Numerous textbooks have described linear closure of the lip as the preferred technique for defects of 25 percent of the upper lip and up to 30 percent of the lower lip. Our experience has shown that superior aesthetic results can be achieved with defects approaching 40 percent on the upper lip and exceeding 50 percent on the lower lip. This is particularly true in the elderly patient.
Cheek (117/186 closed directly in this study) – maximum defect 4 cm. 
The cheek, particularly in the elderly population, is an ideal area for direct linear closure of very large lateral defects. …..
The inherent laxity in the aging cheek and the ability to generously undermine this well-perfused region contribute to this result.
Chin (4/6 closed directly in this study) – maximum defect 2.2 cm.
Care must be taken with direct closure on the chin, as there is little skin laxity. Direct closure must be avoided in a horizontal plane, to prevent the inadvertent development of extrinsic lip ectropion.

Related posts:
Bilobed Flap for Repair of Nose (March 26, 2008)
Skin Grafting in Lower Third Nasal Reconstruction (April 1, 2010)
Reconstruction of the Lip -- Part I (January 29, 2008)


REFERENCE
The Rationale for Direct Linear Closure of Facial Mohs' Defects; Soliman, Sameer; Hatef, Daniel A.; Hollier, Larry H. Jr.; Thornton, James F.; Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 127(1):142-149, January 2011; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f95978

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Propranolol Treatment for Infantile Hemangiomas

Updated 3/2017-- all links removed as many are no longer active and it was easier than checking each one.

The Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Journal article from 2009 (second reference below) spurred Will J. M. Holmes, M.R.C.S and colleagues to write a letter to the journal noting their experience with propranolol in the treatment of infantile hemangiomas.
Holmes cited two articles (references 3 and 4 below) which report the efficacy of of β-blockers in the treatment of hemangioma.
As part of a larger study, we have used propranolol in a total of 15 patients. So far, we have observed signs of rapid involution of hemangioma within the first week of treatment in all patients. The response rate is faster than those we have seen when corticosteroids are used. In addition to stopping the proliferation of hemangiomas, propranolol also causes rapid involution within a short period.
We now offer propranolol as a first-line treatment to all rapidly proliferating hemangiomas with functional deficit and/or disfigurement. We have developed a treatment protocol in conjunction with the cardiologist that involves pretreatment cardiac workup and an in-hospital titration of propranolol up to 1 mg/kg three times per day. So far, we have not needed to increase the dosage to more than 1 mg/kg three times per day.
Their treatment protocol is referenced to the 5th article below.
Related post:  Propranolol for Hemagiomas?  (March 4, 2009)


REFERENCES
1.  Propranolol as First-Line Treatment for Infantile Hemangiomas (Letter); Holmes, Will J. M. M.R.C.S.; Mishra, Anuj M.R.C.S.; Gorst, Cath R.G.N., R.S.C.N.; Liew, Se-Hwang F.R.C.S.; Plast & Reconstr Surgery: January 2010 - Volume 125 - Issue 1 - pp 420-421; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c2a731
2.     Classification of Vascular Anomalies and the Comprehensive Treatment of Hemangiomas;  Burns AJ, Navarro JA, Cooner RD.; Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(1 Suppl.):69e–81e.
3.    Propranolol for severe hemangiomas of infancy; Léauté-Labrèze C, Dumas de la Roque E, Hubiche T, et al.;  N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2649–2651. (pdf)
4.      Beta-blocking Agent for Treatment of Infantile Hemangioma; Bigorre M, Van Kien AK, Valette H. . Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:195e–196e.
5.      More on Propranolol for Hemangioma of Infancy; Siegfried EC, Keenan WJ, Al-Jureidini S. . N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2846–2847.
6.       Ulcerated Hemangiomas of Infancy: Risk Factors and Management Strategies; eLiterature Review (John Hopkins Medicine) , Oct 2007, Vol 1, No 4; Bernard A. Cohen, MD, Susan Matra Rabizadeh, MD, MBA, Mark Lebwohl, MD, and Elizabeth Sloand, PhD, CRNP

Thursday, January 6, 2011

New MRSA Treatment Guidelines

Updated 3/2017-- all links removed as many are no longer active and it was easier than checking each one.

I learned of this thanks to a tweet from @OFPC:
New #MRSA guidelines for the treatment of staph infections http://goo.gl/NQ3xZ #medicine
MRSA (methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus) infections continue to be a growing public health issue, both hospital-acquired and community-acquired.  These guidelines come from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). 
The article is a 38 page document (pdf file, full reference below); the last 10 pages are supporting references.
The major performance measures are:
1. The management of all MRSA infections should include identification, elimination and/or debridement of the primary source and other sites of infection when possible (eg, drainage of abscesses, removal of central venous catheters, and debridement
of osteomyelitis).
2. In patients with MRSA bacteremia, follow-up blood
cultures 2–4 days after initial positive cultures and as needed thereafter are recommended to document clearance of bacteremia.
3. To optimize serum trough concentrations in adult
patients, vancomycin should be dosed according to actual body weight (15–20 mg/kg/dose every 8–12 h), not to exceed 2 g per dose. Trough monitoring is recommended to achieve target concentrations of 15–20 lg/mL in patients with serious MRSA infections and to ensure target concentrations in those who are morbidly obese, have renal dysfunction, or have
fluctuating volumes of distribution. The efficacy and safety of targeting higher trough concentrations in children requires additional study but should be considered in those with severe sepsis or persistent bacteremia.
4. When an alternative to vancomycin is being considered for use, in vitro susceptibility should be confirmed and documented in the medical record.
5. For MSSA infections, a b-lactam antibiotic is the drug of choice in the absence of allergy.
…….
Their recommended management of skin and soft-tissue infections
(SSTIs):
For a cutaneous abscess incision and drainage is the primary treatment.
  • For simple abscesses or boils, incision and drainage alone is likely to be adequate.  Simple boils most likely DON’T need antibiotics.
Antibiotic therapy is recommended for abscesses associated with the following conditions:
  • severe or extensive disease (eg, involving multiple sites of infection)
  • rapid progression in presence of associated cellulitis
  • signs and symptoms of systemic illness
  • associated comorbidities or immunosuppression
  • extremes of age
  • abscess in an area difficult to drain (eg, face, hand, and genitalia)
  • associated septic phlebitis
  • lack of response to incision and drainage alone
……
Antibiotic therapy for outpatients
All antibiotic therapy should be individualized based on the patient’s clinical response.
Patients with purulent cellulitis:  empirical therapy for CA-MRSA is recommended pending culture results.  Five to 10 days of therapy is recommended.
Patients with nonpurulent cellulitis:  empirical therapy for infection due to b-hemolytic streptococci is recommended.  Empirical coverage for CA-MRSA is recommended in patients who do not respond to b-lactam therapy and may be considered in those with systemic toxicity. Five to 10 days of therapy is recommended.
For empirical coverage of CA-MRSA in outpatients with SSTI, oral antibiotic options include the following:
  • clindamycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX),
    a tetracycline (doxycycline or minocycline), and linezolid.
If coverage for both b-hemolytic streptococci and CA-MRSA is desired, options include the following:
  • clindamycin alone or TMP-SMX or a tetracycline in combination with a b-lactam (eg, amoxicillin) or linezolid alone.
Antibiotic therapy for hospitalized patients with complicated SSTI (cSSTI)  -- defined as patients with deeper soft-tissue infections, surgical/traumatic wound infection, major abscesses, cellulitis, and infected ulcers and burns).
In addition to surgical debridement and broad-spectrum antibiotics, empirical therapy for MRSA should be considered pending culture data.  As with outpatients, all antibiotic therapy should be individualized based on the patient’s clinical response.
Options include the following:
  • intravenous (IV) vancomycin, oral (PO) or IV linezolid 600 mg twice daily, daptomycin 4 mg/kg/dose IV once daily, telavancin 10 mg/kg/dose IV once daily, and clindamycin 600 mg IV or PO 3 times a day.
  • A b-lactam antibiotic (eg, cefazolin) may be considered in hospitalized patients with nonpurulent cellulitis with modification to MRSA-active therapy if there is no clinical response. Seven to 14 days of therapy is recommended.
……
Pediatric considerations
Children with minor skin infections (such as impetigo) and secondarily infected skin lesions (such as eczema, ulcers, or lacerations), mupirocin 2% topical ointment can be used.
…..
Patient education is the “heart” of preventing recurrence.
Management of recurrent MRSA SSTIs
Preventive educational messages on personal hygiene and appropriate wound care are recommended for all patients with SSTI.
Instructions should be provided to:
Keep draining wounds covered with clean, dry bandages.
Maintain good personal hygiene with regular bathing and cleaning of hands with soap and water or an alcohol-based hand gel, particularly after touching infected skin or an item that has directly contacted a draining wound.
Avoid reusing or sharing personal items (eg, disposable razors, linens, and towels) that have contacted infected skin.
Environmental hygiene measures should be considered in patients with recurrent SSTI in the household or community
setting:
Focus cleaning efforts on high-touch surfaces (ie, surfaces that come into frequent contact with people’s bare skin each day, such as counters, door knobs, bath tubs, and toilet seats) that may contact bare skin or uncovered infections.
Commercially available cleaners or detergents appropriate for the surface being cleaned should be used according to label instructions for routine cleaning of surfaces.
When decolonization is deemed appropriate (ie prior to elective surgery):
Nasal decolonization with mupirocin twice daily for 5–10 days.
Nasal decolonization with mupirocin twice daily for 5–10 days and topical body decolonization regimens with a skin antiseptic solution (eg, chlorhexidine) for 5–14 days or dilute bleach baths. (For dilute bleach baths, 1 teaspoon per gallon of water [or ¼ cup per ¼ tub or 13 gallons of water] given for 15 min twice weekly for 3 months can be considered.)
Screening cultures prior to decolonization are not
routinely recommended if at least 1 of the prior infections was documented as due to MRSA.
Surveillance cultures following a decolonization regimen are not routinely recommended in the absence of an active infection.
Oral antimicrobial therapy is recommended for the treatment of active infection only and is not routinely recommended for decolonization.
There is much more in the guidelines.  I have focused only on the skin and soft-tissue areas.
 
Related posts:
CAMRSA: Dx and Tx Update for Plastic Surgeons – an Article Review  (January 8, 2009)
Revisit of Community Acquired MRSA--Prevention Tips (October 17, 2007)
 
REFERENCE
Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America for the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Infections in Adults and Children; Catherine Liu, Arnold Bayer, Sara E. Cosgrove, Robert S. Daum, Scott K. Fridkin, Rachel J. Gorwitz, Sheldon L. Kaplan, Adolf W. Karchmer, Donald P. Levine, Barbara E. Murray, Michael J. Rybak, David A. Talan, and Henry F. Chambers; Clin Infect Dis. (2011) doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq146 First published online: January 4, 2011

Monday, January 3, 2011

Maternal Influence

Updated 3/2017-- all links (except to my own posts) removed as many are no longer active and it was easier than checking each one.

Not all maternal influence on daughter behavior is good.  Take for example the influence of the unhealthy use of indoor tanning beds as presented in a recent Archives of Dermatology article (full reference below) which “investigated whether indoor tanning with one's mother the first time would influence frequency of tanning later in life and whether it was associated with age of initiation.”
Joel Hillhouse, Ph.D., of East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, and colleagues published a study the May 2010 issue of the Archives of Dermatology which looked at which health-based intervention worked best in reducing skin cancer risks.  They found that “Emphasizing the appearance-damaging effects of UV light, both indoor and outdoor, to young patients who are tanning is important no matter what their pathological tanning behavior status.”
For this study, Hillhouse and colleagues randomly selected a total of 800 female students  who were then sent a screening questionnaire on their indoor tanning history. Those who reported ever indoor tanning (n = 252) were invited to participate in the study and offered an incentive ($5). A total of 227 (mean age, 21.33 years; age range, 18-30 years) agreed, signed informed consent documents, and completed assessments.
One of the questions asked who accompanied the participant the first time they indoor tanned (ie, tanned alone, with friends, with mother, or other).
Of the 227 female participants, 70 were non-tanners; 113 were moderate tanners; and 44 were heavy tanners.
Nearly twice as many participants experienced indoor tanning for the first time with their mother (n = 88) than went alone (n = 45).  First time tanning with their mother was also higher than with a friend (n = 72) or with someone other than their friend or mother (n = 22).
The prevalence of current indoor tanning use among the 88 participants who went with their mother was nearly 81%, with 31.9% reporting heavy tanning.
Adjusting for age and skin type, the researchers found that the participants who reported tanning with their mother during their initial experience were 4.64 times more likely to be heavy current tanners than those who initiated tanning alone or with someone other than their mother
Let’s get out of the tanning beds and go walking or cycling or swimming or dancing or bowling together.  Mothers (and aunts) lets influence our daughters (and nieces) to be more active.
 

Related posts:
Tanning Beds = High Cancer Risk (August 3, 2009)
Skin Cancer: More than Skin Deep – an Article Review (December 14, 2009)
Get Girls to Focus on Skin’s Appearance (May 19, 2010)



REFERENCE
The Effect of Initial Indoor Tanning With Mother on Current Tanning Patterns; Mary Kate Baker, MPH; Joel James Hillhouse, PhD; Xuefeng Liu, PhD; Arch Dermatol. 2010;146(12):1427-1428. doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2010.349

Monday, November 29, 2010

Suture Material and Skin Irritation

Updated 3/2017-- all links (except to my own posts) removed as many are no longer active and it was easier than checking each one.

I have written about Suture Allergy vs Suture Reactivity so was very interested in this new article accepted for publication in the journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (online ahead of publication). 
The article comes from researchers in Greece who chose to use digital image analysis to evaluate the erythema  associated with tissue reaction to suture material. 
The sutures evaluated were polydioxanone (PDS II(R), Ethicon, Sint-Stevens-Woluwe, Belgium), polypropylene blue (Polypropylene(R), Assut Sutures, Ascheberg-Herbern, Germany), polyamide 6 (Ethilon(R), Ethicon, Neuchatel, Switzerland), metallic clips (APPOSETM, ULC Tyco, Hampshire, UK), and polyglactin (Vicryl Rapid(R), Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany).
Digital photos of 100 patients(70 females, 30 males; all Caucasian) were compared by software, evaluating red color superiority (mean value of red color) in the region surrounding the wound.  Most of the patients were Fitzpatrick skin type II and III (46 and 47 respectfully).  Mean age was 42 years old, ranging from 15 to 86 years. Each underwent the excision of cutaneous and subcutaneous lesions.
Surgical wounds included those after excision of skin or subcutaneous lesions on the face (68%), neck (14%), abdominal wall (12%), axilla (1%) and back (5%). All other anatomical areas were excluded from this study in order to produce sample homogeny as concerns the healing of skin wounds in different body areas.
The researchers excluded wounds which could not be primarily closed without tension or were located over a bony prominence to minimize other confounding factors as were wounds with any kind of post-operative complications, e.g. hematoma, dehiscence or infection for the same reason.
The researchers used two different suture materials in each patient to improve comparison between suture material and skin type.  This was done by dividing each surgical wound into two halves.  Each half was sutured with two different suture materials for each wound. The same number of sutures were used on each half of the wound.  The patients were randomly assigned a pair of suture materials by the means of a sealed envelope method.
The pairing of five different kinds of suture material yielded ten pairs (PDS II- Polypropylene, PDS II - Ethilon, PDS II -metallic clips, PDS II – Vicryl Rapid, Polypropylene - Ethilon,  Polypropylene-metallic clips, Polypropylene-Vicryl Rapid, Ethilon - metallic clips, Ethilon – Vicryl Rapid, metallic clips-Vicryl Rapid).
Each pair was tested on ten patients.  Sutures were removed on the 10th post-operative day.
According to the aforementioned comparisons polydioxanone was found to have the best performance, followed by polyglactin, polyamide, polypropylene and metallic clips. All the above mentioned differences between suture materials were statistically significant (p<0.05).
Their conclusions:
The absorbable sutures used for skin closure in our study were removed after the period of time which is indicated for non-absorbable suture material and respective to the site of the wound. Less skin erythema was observed after the use of absorbable materials (polydioxanone and polyglactin) than with the three nonabsorbable materials (polypropylene, polyamide and metallic clips).
This leads to the conclusion that, when used in skin closure and removed after 10 days, absorbable materials produce less tissue reaction in the form of erythema than non-absorbable sutures do.
So their small study would indicate that PDS II created the least skin redness at 10 days, followed by Vicryl Rapid, Polypropylene, Ethilon, and metallic clips.


REFERENCE
Significant differences in skin irritation of common suture materials assessed by a comparative computerized objective method; Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery: POST ACCEPTANCE, 17 November 2010; doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182043aa6; Original Article: PDF Only

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Pyoderma Gangrenosum of the Breast

Updated 3/2017-- all links (except to my own posts) removed as many are no longer active and it was easier than checking each one.

I was prompted to delve into this topic not because I had a patient with the problem, but because of a MDLink to an article (the first one listed below, subscription required). 
The eMedicine article states:
Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is an uncommon ulcerative cutaneous condition of uncertain etiology. Pyoderma gangrenosum was first described in 1930. It is associated with systemic diseases in at least 50% of patients who are affected. The diagnosis is made by excluding other causes of similar appearing cutaneous ulcerations, including infection, malignancy, vasculitis, collagen vascular diseases, diabetes, and trauma. Ulcerations of pyoderma gangrenosum may occur after trauma or injury to the skin in 30% of patients; this process is termed pathergy.
The 2 primary variants of pyoderma gangrenosum are the classic ulcerative form, usually observed on the legs, and a more superficial variant known as atypical pyoderma gangrenosum that tends to occur on the hands.
Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is not common.   It occurs in about 1 person per 100,000 people each year in the United States.   Basically, PG is a noninfectious neutrophilic dermatosis.
Patients with PG may have involvement of other organ system, most commonly the heart, the central nervous system, the GI tract, the eyes, the liver, the spleen, bones, and lymph nodes.
It is characterized by the presence of 1 or more ulcerations that are typically violaceous with an undermined border. Diagnosis is clinical and dependent on the exclusion of other causes of cutaneous ulceration. No specific pathologic or laboratory findings exist. Concurrent systemic disease occurs in 50% of affected patients. Commonly associated conditions include inflammatory bowel disease, arthritis, and hematologic malignancy. The remaining cases are considered autoimmune or idiopathic
The 5th reference article is open access.   The article is a case presentation of PG localized on the breast (photo credit) in a 51-year-old woman who presented with a large, moderately painful ulceration on her right breast which began 12 days prior to presentation with no history of  injury or trauma. 
Along with the case presentation, the authors notes that in a literature review only 31 cases of PG had been reported (article published in (January 2010).
In most of these cases the lesions were related to previous surgical interventions, probably as the result of a pathergy phenomenon. The main differential diagnoses were skin and soft tissue infections including necrotizing fasciitis, and malignant neoplasms. Negative initial wound cultures and the relative sparing of nipple/areola complex helped to eliminate these disorders.
PG doesn’t respond to antibiotic therapy or the usual wound care.  This is a often the first tipoff.  The recommended therapy involves steroids not antibiotics.
Topical therapies include gentle local wound care and dressings, superpotent topical corticosteroids, cromolyn sodium 2% solution, nitrogen mustard, and 5-aminosalicylic acid. The new topical immune modifiers tacrolimus and pimecrolimus may have some benefit in certain patients.
Systemic therapies include corticosteroids, cyclosporine,  mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine,  dapsone, tacrolimus, cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil, thalidomide, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors, and nicotine.
Intravenous therapies include pulsed methylprednisolone, pulsed cyclophosphamide, infliximab,  and intravenous immune globulin.
Other therapy includes hyperbaric oxygen.

Surgery should be avoided, if possible, because of the pathergic phenomenon that may occur with surgical manipulation or grafting, resulting in wound enlargement. In some patients, grafting has resulted in the development of pyoderma gangrenosum at the harvest site. In the cases in which surgery is required, the best plan, if possible, is to have the patient on therapy in order to prevent pathergy.



REFERENCES
1.  Pyoderma gangrenosum of the breast: A diagnosis not to be missed; A. Duval, N. Boissel, J.M. Servant, C. Santini, A. Petit, M.D. Vignon-Pennamen; Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery - 20 September 2010 (10.1016/j.bjps.2010.07.022)
2.  Pyoderma Gangrenosum; eMedicine article, March 23, 2010; J Mark Jackson, MD, Jeffrey P Callen, MD
3.  Pyoderma gangrenosum; Orphanet Encyclopedia, September 2003; Wollina U.
4.  Atypical Pyoderma Gangrenosum After Breast Reduction;  Karoly Gulyas, FrankW. Kimble; Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Vol 27, No 4, 328-331, DOI: 10.1007/s00266-003-3017-y
5.  Pyoderma gangrenosum on the breast: A case presentation and review of the published work; Ayşe Tülin Mansur, Deniz Balaban,  Fatih GÖKTAY, Sezen Takmaz, The Journal of Dermatology, Special Issue: Systemic Sclerosis (pages 1-84) Volume 37, Issue 1, pages 107–110, January 2010; DOI: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2009.00756.x

Monday, September 27, 2010

Teenagers Use of Self-Tanners

Updated 3/2017-- all links (except to my own posts) removed as many are no longer active and it was easier than checking each one.

Skin cancer rates continue to rise. Exposure to UV radiation and the resulting damage to the skin is major reason. It doesn’t matter whether this exposure is from outdoor or indoor sources.
Use of self-tanners should (intuitively) decrease the exposure to UV radiation as the desired “tan” is obtained from an alternative source. Not necessarily, especially in teens.
The Archives of Dermatology article referenced below reports on a study survey done by Vilma E. Cokkinides, Ph.D., of the American Cancer Society, Atlanta, and colleagues. Their survey was telephone-based conducted, conducted from July 1 through October 30, 2004. A total of 1600 youths and 1589 primary caregiver paired interviews using nearly identical questionnaires were done with an overall response rate of 44.0%.
The Sun Survey assessed the use of sunless tanning products by the adolescents in the past year, along with details about demographics, skin type, attitudes and perceptions of sunless tanning and other sun-related behaviors.
Among the teens surveyed, 10.8% reported using sunless tanning products in the past year. Approximated 14% of their parents used them. Self-reporting teen users tended to be older and female, to perceive a tanned appearance as desirable, to have a parent or caregiver who also used these products and to hold positive beliefs or attitudes about them.
Amazing to me was the finding by the researchers that the teens who used the self-tanners had just as many sunburns the previous summer, were just as likely to use indoor tanning beds, and did not routinely use sunscreen.
The conclusion I draw from this is: Teenagers use self-tanners to augment UV exposure to get (and keep) the level of tan to their skin. Teenagers aren’t thinking about skin cancer.
How do we change this? Gentle nudges as Dr. Luks suggests with exercise. Same thing here – gentle nudges.
Sources
"Use of Sunless Tanning Products Among US Adolescents Aged 11 to 18 Years"; Vilma E. Cokkinides, PhD; Priti Bandi, MS; Martin A. Weinstock, MD, PhD; Elizabeth Ward, PhD; Arch Dermatol. 2010;146(9):987-992. doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2010.220

Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Cultural Practices Affecting the Skin

Updated 3/2017 -- photos and all links (except to my own posts) removed as many no longer active.


I learned of this article (full reference below) via a tweet from @MDLinx last week
Cultural practices affecting the skin of children: Current Opinion in Pediatrics http://bit.ly/dbKdNJ #GM #mdlinx
Thanks to friends I was able to obtain a pdf copy of the article which I would recommend to anyone who see children (pediatricians, family doctors, ER doctors, dermatologists, plastic surgeons, nurses, etc). 
The article reviews cultural practices that present with dermatologic manifestations in the pediatric population.  Most of us have had minimal exposure to these cultural practices.  This can lead to misunderstandings, misdiagnosis, and (unfounded) child abuse accusations. 
The article points out that the 2000 Census counted approximately 28 million first-generation immigrants in the United States.  This increasing diversity means we in health care have to learn more about the diverse cultural practices.  
Here are just a few of the culture practices mentioned in the article:
Coin rubbing and spooning
Coin rubbing or spooning is the cultural practice of
repeated pressured strokes over lubricated skin with a
smooth edge such as a worn coin, a metal cap with a
rounded edge, a ceramic Chinese soup spoon, an even honed animal bone, a water buffalo horn, a piece of jade, or a piece of ginger root. The process involves placing the smooth edge against the preoiled skin surface, pressing down firmly, and then moving down the muscles, with each stroke being 4–6 in. in length. This is also referred to as friction stroking and follows along the pathway of the acupuncture meridians on the surface of the skin, which in this case is on the spine. The resulting extravasation of blood leads to petechiae and ecchymoses, which is referred to in Chinese medicine as the ‘Sha’ rash………….
This photo of gua sha rash is not from the article, but was found here.

Gridding
Gridding is an underreported folk remedy that is most
commonly practiced in Russian cultures as well as Ukraine and other eastern regions of the former Soviet
Union.  Gridding describes the practice of painting the back with iodine in a criss-cross pattern. This results in a hyperpigmented grid-like pattern on the back.  This practice is typically used as a treatment for respiratory illness because the topical application of
iodine results in a warm and mild burning sensation that is thought to aid in relief of cough and congestion….
Cupping
The traditional practice of cupping dates from as early as 3000 B.C. and has been practiced in a variety of cultures worldwide, including Egyptian, Chinese, Greek, European, and Middle-Eastern cultures.
Cupping is the practice of creating a small area of low air pressure next to the skin with a cup leading to suction. Various tools, methods, and procedures are used in creating this reduced air pressure. ……..
More commonly in Middle-Eastern cultures, the skin may be lanced prior to placing the cup, so that the vacuum draws blood into the cup as part of the treatment; this is referred to as wet cupping and is
also a form of bloodletting.  ……..
This photo is not from the article, but was found here

Moxibustion
Moxibustion is a traditional Chinese medicine therapy
that is also used in other Asian cultures such as Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, Tibetan, and Mongolian.  ……… This often leads to erythema and commonly causes burns, especially with the direct application. Moxibustion ……… may mimic signs of physical abuse such as those seen with cigarette burns.
Phytophotodermatitis and photodermatitis
Phytophotodermatitis causes skin lesions that result from the interaction of ultraviolet light with photosensitizing compounds present in various plants. The resulting skin lesions due to phototoxicity can manifest as erythema, hyperpigmentation, vesicles, bullae, or all. Lesions are often in unusual shapes and can appear within hours to days of exposure………..
The most common phytophotodermatitis is that of lime
juice. Lime juice is used in various cultures as a folk
remedy for ……various ailments, such as for acne, fungal infections, and scars, as well as for skin and hair lightening. …... Other agents that can cause phototoxic effects include lemons, celery, carrots,  oranges, parsley, parsnips, tobacco, figs, garlic, and hot peppers, in addition to numerous other agents.

It is an article well worth reading.


REFERENCE
Cultural Practices Affecting the Skin of Children;   Parisa Ravanfar,  James G. Dinulos;  Current Opinion in Pediatrics, August 2010 - Volume 22 - Issue 4 - p 423–431, doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32833bc352