tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7675087351939177300.post3016472984793513680..comments2023-08-15T09:39:41.235-05:00Comments on Sutured for a Living: $250,000 for Loss of Consortium?rlbateshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15236331355857884458noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7675087351939177300.post-80924010167497650312010-03-31T13:51:39.654-05:002010-03-31T13:51:39.654-05:00"What did the doctor do that was wrong?"..."What did the doctor do that was wrong?"<br /><br />How can you - you read a paragraph summarizing a likely 2 week trial with mountains of evidence. You'd have to order the transcript to know anything about the facts of the case, and if it means we need "reform". To draw conclusions from that blurb would be irresponsible, at best. Unless you're Trent Lott that is, and can make diagnoses on very limited info.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7675087351939177300.post-7802698884610860652010-03-31T13:49:44.279-05:002010-03-31T13:49:44.279-05:00Because medical malpractice is a state law action ...Because medical malpractice is a state law action and has no business being regulated by federal statute. Principles of federalism and all. Physicians seem to be pretty anti-federal government interference, until they want something from the feds that is.<br /><br />Why should the federal government dictate the value of a case as opposed to a jury who has heard all the facts?<br /><br />Your state, Arkansas, has already had "reform". What more do you want?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7675087351939177300.post-82044652771578246512010-03-26T09:41:27.877-05:002010-03-26T09:41:27.877-05:00What I don't understand is where the malpracti...What I don't understand is where the malpractice is. What did the doctor do that was wrong?DHShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00251680600047999918noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7675087351939177300.post-39198334632846946802010-03-25T17:43:47.010-05:002010-03-25T17:43:47.010-05:00We certainly need tort reform now and this is just...We certainly need tort reform now and this is just one example of why...Happy is right, consortium lost because of change in face? Turn out the lights is that is all their love wasBrainDamehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05938749719805630693noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7675087351939177300.post-6525707583573504022010-03-23T18:06:40.912-05:002010-03-23T18:06:40.912-05:00Don't know, Happy.Don't know, Happy.rlbateshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15236331355857884458noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7675087351939177300.post-38382082065701349702010-03-23T18:04:41.086-05:002010-03-23T18:04:41.086-05:00Does that mean men who marry women who become ugly...Does that mean men who marry women who become ugly in their eyes due to weight gain can sue food companies for loss of (what ever that word was)?The Happy Hospitalisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14392872203166584371noreply@blogger.com